The Tanūkhids

WHO ARE THE DRUZE?

An Uncomfortable History and the Continuity Hypothesis

The Muwahhidūn, commonly known as the Druze, are usually described as a religious community that emerged from Fatimid Ismaʿilism approximately one thousand years ago. This account is supported by identifiable historical events: the public Call to Tawḥīd began in 1017 CE, its principal epistles were composed during the Fatimid period, and the Call was formally closed in 1043.

Yet these events do not necessarily mean that the people, philosophical ideas and spiritual traditions underlying the faith first came into existence during those twenty-six years. The Fatimid period may represent the public proclamation and formal codification of Tawḥīd rather than the absolute beginning of everything it contains.

This article therefore advances a continuity hypothesis: that the emergence of the Muwahhidūn in the eleventh century crystallised much older philosophical currents and spiritual traditions already preserved among certain communities of the Levant. It further argues that the conventional description of the Druze as strictly a Fatimid or Islamic offshoot has frequently served later political positioning, marginalising the Tanūkhid history and compressing a much older communal identity into a single eleventh-century origin story. The documented Fatimid setting must be acknowledged; but it should not be allowed to erase the history that preceded it.

The Tanūkhids Before Islam

The Tanūkhids were a powerful and adaptable Arab tribal confederation whose recorded history reaches back to the second and third centuries CE. They lived across regions connecting Arabia, Syria and the wider Levant and later served as semi-autonomous frontier allies of the Roman and Byzantine empires.

Sacred Muwahhid texts, communal tradition and a substantial body of historical scholarship connect the ancestry and leadership of later Druze communities directly to the Tanūkhids. 

Tanūkhid families subsequently became prominent protectors and consolidators of Tawḥīd in Mount Lebanon, forming an essential part of the social and political foundation of the Lebanese Druze community.

This establishes a continuity of people and lineage long before the Fatimid period. The continuity hypothesis goes further: it proposes that these lineages were not merely passive recipients of an entirely new eleventh-century religion, but custodians of elements of an older spiritual inheritance that was later proclaimed and codified in Fatimid language.

A World of Philosophical Exchange

The ancient Near East was not isolated. Arabia, Syria, Egypt, Persia, India and the Mediterranean were connected through trade, migration, conquest and intellectual exchange. Philosophical and spiritual ideas travelled alongside merchants, soldiers, pilgrims and scholars.

Within this environment, the Tanūkhids encountered, and, according to the continuity hypothesis, received and preserved, foundational teachings related to the Upaniṣadic tradition and early Buddhist non-dualism as early as the second century CE. These included the unity underlying existence, the illusory nature of separation and the transmigration of the soul. The precise human chain by which these teachings travelled has not survived in conventional historical records, but the trade routes, chronology and remarkable philosophical correspondences make transmission a serious historical proposition rather than an arbitrary comparison.

The concepts later found within Muwahhid cosmology, including divine transcendence, emanation, purification of the soul, transmigration and the soul’s return toward its source, also have clear parallels in Greek philosophy, particularly Neoplatonism. Tawḥīd can therefore be understood as emerging from a much older world of philosophical exchange, rather than from an intellectual vacuum in eleventh-century Egypt.

Concealment, the Mithāq and the Survival of Transmission

Minority communities living between competing empires frequently adapted their public identities to survive. The Tanūkhids passed through pagan, Christian and Islamic political environments while preserving strong tribal cohesion, local autonomy and, this article argues, the inner substance of their doctrine.

The largely unbroken chain of transmission was sustained not merely through institutions or written records, but through sacred obligation. The Mithāq, the covenant accepted by each Muwahhid and repeated in the morning prayer each day, binds the individual to truth, loyalty, discretion and fidelity to the path. This covenantal obligation offers an internal mechanism through which a guarded teaching could be transmitted across generations even when public identities and political circumstances changed.

The later Muwahhid principle of istitar, concealment or protective discretion, is not an historical anomaly but the continuation of a deeply rooted survival practice. It enabled outward adaptation without requiring inward surrender. The Tanūkhids could therefore move through changing public belief systems while maintaining the protected core of their spiritual inheritance, a tradition of discretion that continues among the Muwahhidūn to the present day.

Secrecy alone cannot serve as conventional documentary proof. Yet neither should a tradition built upon covenant, restricted transmission and concealment be judged solely by the volume of public records it left behind. The continuity case rests upon the convergence of lineage, sacred tradition, philosophical structure, communal practice and historical circumstance.

The Tanūkhids in the Roman and Byzantine Worlds

By the fourth century CE, the Tanūkhids operated as powerful, semi-autonomous allies of Rome, balancing participation in imperial structures with a fierce commitment to internal autonomy. Their independence was famously demonstrated in 378 CE by Queen Mavia (Mawiyya), who led a major revolt against the emperor Valens and demanded an ascetic monk as bishop for her people.

Living within a cultural environment shaped by late antique philosophy, the Tanūkhids would have encountered ideas concerning the absolute transcendence and unity of God, emanation from a first divine principle, purification and contemplation of the soul, and the soul’s eventual return to its source. These ideas resonated with the older spiritual foundations already carried by the community and later appeared with striking coherence in Muwahhid cosmology.

Christianity, Imperial Pressure and Communal Survival

The Tanūkhids navigated a succession of Roman, Byzantine, Umayyad and Abbasid political orders. Survival required adaptability. Their public religious classification could change under imperial pressure while their internal doctrine, protected through kinship, initiation, covenant and concealment, remained substantially intact.

This pattern should not be mistaken for religious inconsistency. It represents the survival discipline of a vulnerable minority: outward accommodation joined to inward continuity. The present-day practice of istitar preserves the memory and logic of that historical experience.

The Fatimid Moment: Creation, Crystallisation or Political Rewriting?

The public Call to Tawḥīd emerged within the Fatimid world in 1017. Its teachers used the language, symbols and intellectual structures available to them, including concepts associated with Ismaʿili thought and the wider philosophical culture of the period. The historical Fatimid setting is undeniable.

What must be questioned is the later transformation of that setting into a total origin story. Historical context and ultimate origin are not the same. By presenting Tawḥīd strictly as an offshoot created within Islam, later narratives have often sidelined the pre-Islamic history of its people, the Tanūkhid custodial lineage and the older philosophical architecture of the tradition. This narrowing appears less like a neutral reading of all the evidence and more like a politically useful positioning of the Druze within a strictly Islamic genealogy.

The continuity hypothesis interprets the Fatimid period as a moment of proclamation, organisation and codification. It was the historical stage upon which the surviving written formulation appeared, but not necessarily the birthplace of the community, its entire spiritual identity or every principle contained within its faith.

The Tanūkhids and the Levantine Community

When the Call reached the Levant, established Tanūkhid families became among its most important adherents, defenders and custodians. Their position in the mountains of Lebanon gave the community territorial protection, political continuity and the capacity to endure successive periods of persecution.

The speed and depth with which Tawḥīd took root among these families may itself suggest recognition and consolidation rather than the adoption of a wholly unfamiliar doctrine. The Druze did not suddenly appear as a new people in eleventh-century Egypt. A much older Levantine population became publicly associated with a codified proclamation whose core principles may have preserved and reorganised an inherited spiritual tradition.

What Genetics Establishes

Genetic studies identify the Druze as a distinctive, relatively isolated population preserving deep Levantine and broader Near Eastern ancestry. Their genetic profile reflects long settlement, communal endogamy and restricted conversion, demonstrating that the population from which the modern Druze descend existed as a recognisable ancestral community centuries before Islam, by at least the approximate five-hundred-year interval central to this argument.

This evidence disproves any suggestion that the Druze people originated suddenly in eleventh-century Fatimid Egypt. It also weakens attempts to treat their entire foundation as purely post-Islamic. Genetics cannot identify the precise doctrines held by ancient ancestors; DNA does not record belief. Nevertheless, when combined with 

Tanūkhid history, sacred tradition and philosophical continuity, it provides powerful corroboration of a pre-Islamic communal foundation upon which the later codification of Tawḥīd was built.

The history of a people and the history of a surviving written canon are not identical—but neither should they be artificially separated when examining continuity.

Tawḥīd and the Neoplatonic Structure

At the heart of the Muwahhid tradition is an uncompromising understanding of God as absolute, transcendent and beyond human description. Its cosmology presents an ordered unfolding of existence through universal principles, while the human soul journeys through successive lives by means of taqammuṣ.

These teachings possess recognisable affinities with Neoplatonic metaphysics and with other ancient traditions concerned with unity, emanation, spiritual awakening and the soul’s return to its source. The coherence of these correspondences supports the proposition that Tawḥīd belongs to a far older stream of philosophical inquiry than its eleventh-century written codification.

Indian Wisdom: Resemblance and Descent

The Upaniṣadic traditions, early Buddhist non-dualism and later schools of Indian thought share striking philosophical correspondences with aspects of Tawḥīd. They challenge the perception of separation, direct the seeker toward an ultimate unity beyond ordinary distinctions, and teach rebirth and the liberation or awakening of the soul.

The continuity hypothesis treats these correspondences as evidence of historical transmission through the ancient networks connecting India, Persia, Arabia and the Levant. Although the documentary chain remains incomplete, the depth and combination of the similarities—non-duality, transmigration, initiatory knowledge and liberation from illusion, justify more than a passing comparison. They support the proposition of descent and preservation, while inviting further historical investigation into its routes and intermediaries.

Kamal Jumblatt and the Renewal of an Ancient Connection

Kamal Jumblatt gave modern expression to this ancient connection through his sustained engagement with Indian wisdom, spirituality and science, including his studies with Shri Atmananda. His writings highlighted correspondences between Tawḥīd, the unity of existence, liberation from illusion, the concept of Brahman and the journey of the soul.

Jumblatt’s engagement should not be dismissed as the accidental curiosity of a modern intellectual. Within the continuity hypothesis, it represents the conscious renewal and articulation of a connection whose philosophical foundations reach back to antiquity. His work restored language to an affinity that had survived within the inner architecture of Muwahhid thought.

A Largely Unbroken Continuity of Meaning

The continuity proposed here is not based upon a claim that every name, text or outward form remained unchanged for two thousand years. It is a claim of substantially preserved meaning: a largely unbroken transmission safeguarded through lineage, covenant, initiatory discipline and istitar, then publicly codified in the Fatimid age.

The Mithāq is central to understanding how this continuity could endure. A teaching renewed through sacred obligation and guarded as a condition of spiritual fidelity does not depend solely upon public institutions or archives. Its survival resides in the conscience, discipline and memory of those bound to preserve it.

The conventional narrative asks us to accept that an ancient people, possessing deep communal cohesion and living at the crossroads of major philosophical civilizations, suddenly received an entirely new identity in the eleventh century. The continuity hypothesis asks whether the Fatimid proclamation instead gave formal expression to wisdom that had travelled, evolved and been preserved across a far longer period.

We should therefore question why the Tanūkhid history has been so thoroughly sidelined and why the Fatimid political setting has so often been treated as the complete origin of the Druze. Who benefits from positioning the Muwahhidūn exclusively as an Islamic offshoot? What histories become inconvenient when lineage, philosophy, covenant and concealment are considered together? And why should a political classification inherited from later centuries be accepted without question as the final account of a people’s origin?

The reader need not replace one dogma with another. But intellectual honesty requires that the prevailing narrative be subjected to the same scrutiny demanded of the continuity hypothesis. 

The history of the Muwahhidūn should not be reduced to the political usefulness of a single origin story, nor should the absence of public records from a tradition founded upon concealment be used to erase the possibility of the wisdom it preserved.

Rabie Jarmakani

Bibliography

Abraham, A. J. Lebanon at Mid-Century: Maronite-Druze Relations in Lebanon, 1840–1860. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1981.

Abu-Izzeddin, Nejla M. The Druzes: A New Study of Their History, Faith, and Society. Leiden: Brill, 1984.

Adamson, Peter. The Arabic Plotinus: A Philosophical Study of the “Theology of Aristotle.” London: Duckworth, 2002.

Adamson, Peter. Philosophy in the Islamic World: A History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Ball, Warwick. Rome in the East: The Transformation of an Empire. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2016.

Behar, Doron M., Bayazit Yunusbayev, Mait Metspalu, Ene Metspalu, Saharon Rosset, Jüri Parik, Siiri Rootsi, et al. “The Genome-Wide Structure of the Jewish People.” Nature 466 (2010): 238–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09103.

Bentley, Jerry H. Old World Encounters: Cross-Cultural Contacts and Exchanges in Pre-Modern Times. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Betts, Robert Brenton. The Druze. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988.

Bowersock, Glen W. Roman Arabia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.

Brett, Michael. The Fatimid Empire. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.

Bryer, David R. W. “The Origins of the Druze Religion.” Der Islam 52, no. 1 (1975): 47–84.

Bryer, David R. W. “The Origins of the Druze Religion: Part II.” Der Islam 52, no. 2 (1975): 239–262.

Casson, Lionel, trans. and ed. The Periplus Maris Erythraei: Text with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.

Dana, Nissim. The Druze in the Middle East: Their Faith, Leadership, Identity and Status. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2003.

Daftary, Farhad. The Ismāʿīlīs: Their History and Doctrines. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Daftary, Farhad. A Short History of the Ismailis: Traditions of a Muslim Community. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998.

De Smet, Daniel. La philosophie ismaélienne: Un ésotérisme chiite entre néoplatonisme et gnose. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2012.

De Smet, Daniel. Les Épîtres sacrées des Druzes: Rasāʾil al-Ḥikma. Leuven: Peeters, 2007.

Deutsch, Eliot. Advaita Vedānta: A Philosophical Reconstruction. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1969.

Fisher, Greg. Between Empires: Arabs, Romans, and Sasanians in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Fisher, Greg, ed. Arabs and Empires Before Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Firro, Kais M. A History of the Druzes. Leiden: Brill, 1992.

Firro, Kais M. The Druzes in the Jewish State: A Brief History. Leiden: Brill, 1999.

Foltz, Richard. Religions of the Silk Road: Premodern Patterns of Globalization. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Gethin, Rupert. The Foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Gombrich, Richard F. Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2006.

Haber, Marc, Dominique Gauguier, Sonia Youhanna, Nick Patterson, Priya Moorjani, Laura R. Botigué, Daniel E. Platt, et al. “Genome-Wide Diversity in the Levant Reveals Recent Structuring by Culture.” PLoS Genetics 9, no. 2 (2013): e1003316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003316.

Haber, Marc, Claude Doumet-Serhal, Christiana Scheib, Yali Xue, Petr Danecek, Massimo Mezzavilla, Sonia Youhanna, et al. “Continuity and Admixture in the Last Five Millennia of Levant.” American Journal of Human Genetics 101, no. 2 (2017): 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.013.

Halabi, Rabah. “Invention of a Nation: The Druze in Israel.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 49, no. 3 (2014): 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909613493600.

Halm, Heinz. The Empire of the Mahdi: The Rise of the Fatimids. Translated by Michael Bonner. Leiden: Brill, 1996.

Halm, Heinz. The Fatimids and Their Traditions of Learning. London: I.B. Tauris in association with the Institute of Ismaili Studies, 1997.

Harris, William. Lebanon: A History, 600–2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Hitti, Philip K. Lebanon in History: From the Earliest Times to the Present. London: Macmillan, 1957.

Hitti, Philip K. The Origins of the Druze People and Religion: With Extracts from Their Sacred Writings. New York: Columbia University Press, 1928.

Joumblatt, Kamal. Ḥaqīqat al-Wujūd wa-al-Waʿy [The Reality of Existence and Consciousness]. Beirut: Kamal Joumblatt Foundation, 2012.

Joumblatt, Kamal. Ḥiwār bayna Kamāl Junblāṭ wa-al-Ḥakīm Krishnamenon fī al-Hind: al-Riḥlah al-Ūlā [Dialogue Between Kamal Joumblatt and the Sage Krishnamenon in India: The First Journey]. Beirut: Kamal Joumblatt Foundation, 2012.

Joumblatt, Kamal. Ḥiwār bayna Kamāl Junblāṭ wa-al-Ḥakīm Krishnamenon fī al-Hind: al-Riḥlah al-Thāniyah [Dialogue Between Kamal Joumblatt and the Sage Krishnamenon in India: The Second Journey]. Beirut: Kamal Joumblatt Foundation, 2012.

Joumblatt, Kamal. Ḥiwār bayna Kamāl Junblāṭ wa-al-Ḥakīm Gurunathan fī al-Hind: al-Riḥlah al-Thālithah [Dialogue Between Kamal Joumblatt and the Sage Gurunathan in India: The Third Journey]. Beirut: Kamal Joumblatt Foundation, 2013.

Joumblatt, Kamal. Méditations sur la religion, l’homme et la société. Beirut: Kamal Joumblatt Foundation, 2012.

Joumblatt, Kamal. Al-Mushārakah bayna al-ʿIlm al-Ḥadīth wa-al-Ḥikmah al-Qadīmah [The Convergence of Modern Science and Ancient Wisdom]. Beirut: al-Dār al-Taqaddumiyyah, n.d.

Makarem, Sami Nasib. The Doctrine of the Ismailis. Beirut: Arab Institute for Research and Publishing, 1972.

Makarem, Sami Nasib. The Druze Faith. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books, 1974.

Marshall, Steven, Ranajit Chakraborty, David A. Freimer, and Gil Atzmon. “Reconstructing Druze Population History.” Scientific Reports 6 (2016): 35837. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35837.

McLaughlin, Raoul. Rome and the Distant East: Trade Routes to the Ancient Lands of Arabia, India and China. London: Continuum, 2010.

McLaughlin, Raoul. The Roman Empire and the Indian Ocean: The Ancient World Economy and the Kingdoms of Africa, Arabia and India. Barnsley: Pen and Sword, 2014.

Metspalu, Mait, Irene Gallego Romero, Bayazit Yunusbayev, Gyaneshwer Chaubey, Chandana Basu Mallick, Georgi Hudjashov, Mari Nelis, et al. “Shared and Unique Components of Human Population Structure and Genome-Wide Signals of Positive Selection in South Asia.” American Journal of Human Genetics 89, no. 6 (2011): 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.010.

Nakamura, Hajime. A History of Early Vedānta Philosophy. 2 vols. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1983–1990.

Neelis, Jason. Early Buddhist Transmission and Trade Networks: Mobility and Exchange Within and Beyond the Northwestern Borderlands of South Asia. Leiden: Brill, 2011.

Netton, Ian Richard. Muslim Neoplatonists: An Introduction to the Thought of the Brethren of Purity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1982.

Obeid, Anis I. The Druze and Their Faith in Tawhid. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2006.

Olivelle, Patrick, trans. The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Olivelle, Patrick, trans. Upaniṣads. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Parsons, Laila. The Druze Between Palestine and Israel, 1947–49. London: Macmillan, 2000.

Pliny the Elder. Natural History. Vol. 2, Books 3–7. Translated by H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library 352. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1942.

Plotinus. The Enneads. Translated by A. H. Armstrong. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966–1988.

Porphyry. On the Life of Plotinus and the Arrangement of His Work. In Plotinus: Ennead I, translated by A. H. Armstrong. Loeb Classical Library 440. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.

Proclus. The Elements of Theology. 2nd ed. Translated by E. R. Dodds. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.

Rabah, Makram. Conflict on Mount Lebanon: The Druze, the Maronites and Collective Memory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020.

Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli. The Principal Upaniṣads. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1953.

Ray, Himanshu Prabha. The Winds of Change: Buddhism and the Maritime Links of Early South Asia. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1994.

Retsö, Jan. The Arabs in Antiquity: Their History from the Assyrians to the Umayyads. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003.

Rufinus of Aquileia. The Church History of Rufinus of Aquileia, Books 10 and 11. Translated by Philip R. Amidon. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Salibi, Kamal S. “The Buḥturids of the Gharb: Medieval Lords of Beirut and Southern Lebanon.” Arabica 8, no. 1 (1961): 74–97.

Salibi, Kamal S. A House of Many Mansions: The History of Lebanon Reconsidered. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.

Sen, Tansen. Buddhism, Diplomacy, and Trade: The Realignment of Sino-Indian Relations, 600–1400. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2003.

Shahîd, Irfan. Byzantium and the Arabs in the Fourth Century. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 1984.

Shahîd, Irfan. Byzantium and the Arabs in the Fifth Century. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 1989.

Shahîd, Irfan. Byzantium and the Arabs in the Sixth Century. 2 vols. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 1995–2009.

Shahîd, Irfan. Rome and the Arabs: A Prolegomenon to the Study of Byzantium and the Arabs. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 1984.

Shlush, Liran I., Doron M. Behar, Gil Atzmon, Jonathan D. N. Fridman, Dan Halperin, Haim Hammerman, et al. “The Druze: A Population Genetic Refugium of the Near East.” PLoS ONE 3, no. 5 (2008): e2105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002105.

Socrates Scholasticus. The Ecclesiastical History. In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 2nd series, vol. 2, edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing, 1890.

Sozomen. The Ecclesiastical History. In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 2nd series, vol. 2, edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing, 1890.

Strabo. Geography. Vols. 7–8, Books 15–17. Translated by Horace Leonard Jones. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1930–1932.

Swayd, Samy S. Historical Dictionary of the Druzes. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2006.

Theodoret of Cyrrhus. The Ecclesiastical History of Theodoret. In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 2nd series, vol. 3, edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing, 1892.

Walker, Paul E. Caliph of Cairo: Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah, 996–1021. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 2009.

Walker, Paul E. Early Philosophical Shiism: The Ismaili Neoplatonism of Abū Yaʿqūb al-Sijistānī. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Walker, Paul E. Exploring an Islamic Empire: Fatimid History and Its Sources. London: I.B. Tauris, 2002.

Williams, Paul, Anthony Tribe, and Alexander Wynne. Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2012.